Law Exam MCQ Questions and Answers

Practice Mode
Showing 10 of 318 questions
Q191
When can a person prove his own statement constituting admission, or it may be proved on his behalf ?
  • A When it is relevant as dying declaration
  • B When it is relevant as admission
  • C When it is relevant as confession
  • D When it is only an oral admission as to content of electronic record
Answer: Option A
Q192
When can a person prove his own statement constituting admission, or it may be proved on his behalf ?
  • A When it is relevant as dying declaration
  • B When it is relevant as admission
  • C When it is relevant as confession
  • D When it is only an oral admission as to content of electronic record
Answer: Option A
Q193
What is the evidentiary value of the confession of a co-accused implicating himself as well as his other non-confessing coaccused ?
  • A Such a confession is relevant against all the co-accused
  • B It shall not be relevant against non-confessing coaccused
  • C Such a confession amounts to proof of guilt of all the coaccused
  • D If the confessing co-accused is acquitted of the main offence, his confession shall cease to be admissible
Answer: Option A
Q194
Admissions are-
  • A Conclusive proof
  • B Not Conclusive proof
  • C Not estoppel
  • D None of the above is correct
Answer: Option B
Q195
The case of Sarat Chander Dey v. Gopal Chander Laha, (1891) 19 I.A. 203 is related to which of the following section of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ?
  • A Section 6
  • B Section 115
  • C Section 124
  • D Section 45
Answer: Option B
Q196
In which year the electronic evidence was incorporated in the Indian evidence Act as a part of documentary Evidence ?
  • A 2001
  • B 2002
  • C 2000
  • D 1999
Answer: Option C
Q197
Which of the following is not a public document ?
  • A Records of a nationalized Bank
  • B A post-mortem report
  • C A private waqf deed, recorded in the office of subregistrar
  • D Entries made by a police officer in the site inspection map and site memo
Answer: Option B
Q198
An accused charged under section 302 and 304 B of the Indian Penal Code is acquitted of the offence under section 302 of Indian Penal Code. The presumption under section 113 B of the Evidence Act is-
  • A Automatically refuted
  • B Not refuted
  • C Not relevant
  • D Irrelevant and otiose
Answer: Option B
Q199
The case of Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor relates to-
  • A Res gestae
  • B Dying declaration
  • C Accomplice
  • D Co-accused
Answer: Option B
Q200
The main characteristic of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is-
  • A The separation of the judiciary from the executive
  • B The separation of the legislature from the executive
  • C The separation of the revenue work from the executive
  • D To provide judicial powers to the executive magistrates
Answer: Option A

📚 More from Law Exam

← All Topics 🎯 Practice ⏱️ Take Test 🔍 Search
Law Exam
Back to Law Exam
Other Subjects
Questions and Answers for Competitive Exams Various Entrance Test