Law Exam Question and Answer
Law Exam Question and Answer
311. Assertion (A) : Marriage brokerage contract is valid.
Reason (R) : Marriage brokerage contract is opposed to public policy.
Codes :
Reason (R) : Marriage brokerage contract is opposed to public policy.
Codes :
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
312. In which of the following instances has the discharge of agreement not been effected ?
- A promises to paint a picture for B. B afterwards forbid him to do so
- A owes B Rs. 5,000. C pays to B Rs. 1,000 which B accepts in satisfaction of his claim against A
- A awaits arrival of B to finish the painting for B
- A owes B Rs. 2,000 and is also indebted to other creditors. A makes an arrangement with his creditors, including B, to pay them, half of the loan amount. A pays to B Rs. 1,000
313. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court raised doubts regarding the applicability of the doctrine of equitable estoppel beyond Section 115, Evidence Act ?
- Mercantile Bank of India Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India Ltd.
- Madanappa Vs. Chandramma
- Turner Morrison and Co. Vs. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
- Sitaram Vs. State of UP
314. The period of limitation prescribed for taking cognizance of the offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years is—
- 1 year
- 2 year
- 3 years
- 4 years
315. “Too many appeals and revisions are a bane of the Indian Judicial System, involving as it does sterile expense and delay and fruitless chase of perfection.”
Justice Krishna Iyer made this observation in—
Justice Krishna Iyer made this observation in—
- Harnam Singh Vs. State of HP
- Mohd. Sauman Ali Vs. State of Assam
- Sitaram Vs. State of UP
- Jawaharlal Singh Vs. Naresh Singh
316. Match List–I with List–II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists :
List–I
(a) Supervening impossibility
(b) Consideration
(c) Good faith
(d) Dunlop Tyre Co. Vs. Selfridge and Co.
List–II
1. Uberrima fides contract
2. Frustration
3. Privity of contract
4. Quid pro quo
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
List–I
(a) Supervening impossibility
(b) Consideration
(c) Good faith
(d) Dunlop Tyre Co. Vs. Selfridge and Co.
List–II
1. Uberrima fides contract
2. Frustration
3. Privity of contract
4. Quid pro quo
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
- 1 3 4 2
- 3 2 1 4
- 2 4 1 3
- 2 1 3 4
317. Which one of the following is a true statement in relation to Section 80 of Civil Procedure Code ?
- A suit without service of notice can be instituted generally, with the leave of the court
- A suit without service of notice can be instituted in cases of urgent or immediate relief, with the leave of the court
- In cases of urgent or immediate relief where leave to institute the suit without service of notice has been granted, interim or otherwise ex parte relief can be granted
- No suit under Section 80 can be instituted without the compliance of the requirement of notice
318. A contingent contract based on the specified uncertain event not happening within a fixed time—
- Can be enforced if the event does not happen within the fixed time
- Cannot be enforced at all, being void
- Can be enforced if before the expiry of fixed time, it becomes certain that such an event shall not happen
- Both (A) and (C)