Statement and Argument Questions and Answers
Practice ModeShowing 10 of 25 questions
Q21
Statement: "Should India have a national digital currency?"
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will reduce transaction costs and improve financial inclusion.
II. No, it will pose privacy risks and require massive technological infrastructure.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments are strong. Argument I highlights efficiency and inclusion benefits, while Argument II addresses privacy concerns and implementation challenges.
Q22
Statement: "Should India have a national ban on single-use plastics?"
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will significantly reduce environmental pollution and protect wildlife.
II. No, it will affect packaging industries and lead to job losses.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments present valid concerns. Argument I addresses environmental protection, while Argument II considers economic and employment impacts.
Q23
Statement: "Should India have a national policy for work from home?"
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will reduce traffic congestion and improve work-life balance.
II. No, it will reduce team collaboration and affect organizational culture.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Argument I is strong for urban and lifestyle benefits. Argument II is weak as technology enables effective collaboration in remote work settings.
Q24
Statement: "Should India have a national ban on junk food in schools?"
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will promote healthy eating habits and reduce childhood obesity.
II. No, it will affect food businesses and limit consumer choice.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Argument I is strong for health and nutrition benefits. Argument II is weak as children's health should take priority over business interests in educational settings.
Q25
Statement: "Should India have a national policy for electric vehicle adoption?"
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will reduce air pollution and decrease oil import dependence.
II. No, it will require massive infrastructure investment and affect traditional auto industry.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments are strong. Argument I addresses environmental and energy security benefits, while Argument II considers implementation costs and industrial transition challenges.