Statement and Argument Questions and Answers

Practice Mode
Showing 10 of 25 questions
Q1
Statement: "Should India focus more on manufacturing sector than service sector?" Arguments: I. Yes, manufacturing creates more employment opportunities for semi-skilled and unskilled labor. II. No, service sector contributes more to GDP and requires less infrastructure investment.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Argument I is strong as manufacturing indeed creates more jobs for semi-skilled workers. Argument II is weak as it ignores long-term sustainability and balanced growth.
Q2
Statement: "Should the government ban all plastic packaging in the country?" Arguments: I. Yes, plastic pollution is destroying our environment and marine life. II. No, it will adversely affect industries and lead to job losses.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Argument I is strong due to environmental concerns. Argument II is also strong as it considers economic implications, making both arguments valid.
Q3
Statement: "Should India switch to presidential form of government?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will provide stable governance and quick decision-making. II. No, it is against the basic structure of our constitution.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Argument I is strong as presidential system offers stability. Argument II is weak as constitution can be amended, and basic structure doctrine has exceptions.
Q4
Statement: "Should capital punishment be abolished in India?" Arguments: I. Yes, every human has right to life and reformation. II. No, it acts as strong deterrent for heinous crimes.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments are strong. Argument I emphasizes human rights and reformation, while Argument II focuses on deterrence value for serious crimes.
Q5
Statement: "Should professional degrees like engineering and medicine be offered only in government institutions?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will maintain quality of education and prevent commercialization. II. No, it will reduce opportunities for students and increase burden on government.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Argument I is strong for quality control. Argument II is also strong as it highlights reduced opportunities and government burden.
Q6
Statement: "Should India have a uniform civil code?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will promote national integration and gender equality. II. No, it will interfere with religious freedom and cultural diversity.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments present valid perspectives. Argument I focuses on national unity and equality, while Argument II emphasizes religious and cultural rights.
Q7
Statement: "Should voting be made compulsory in India?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will strengthen democracy and increase political accountability. II. No, it violates individual freedom and right to choose.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option A
Explanation: Argument I is strong as compulsory voting enhances democratic participation. Argument II is weak as voting is a civic duty, not just a right.
Q8
Statement: "Should India legalize sports betting?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will generate substantial tax revenue and curb illegal activities. II. No, it will promote gambling addiction and financial ruin for families.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Argument I is strong due to revenue benefits and regulation. Argument II is also strong as it highlights social costs and addiction risks.
Q9
Statement: "Should India have a two-child policy?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will control population growth and conserve resources. II. No, it will lead to gender imbalance and human rights violations.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Argument I is strong for population control. Argument II is also strong as it highlights potential gender discrimination and rights issues.
Q10
Statement: "Should India introduce inheritance tax?" Arguments: I. Yes, it will reduce wealth inequality and generate government revenue. II. No, it will discourage savings and investment and lead to capital flight.
  • A Only I is strong
  • B Only II is strong
  • C Both I and II are strong
  • D Neither I nor II is strong
Answer: Option C
Explanation: Both arguments are strong. Argument I addresses wealth inequality, while Argument II considers economic incentives and capital movement.

📚 More from Logical Reasoning

← All Topics 🎯 Practice ⏱️ Take Test 🔍 Search
Logical Reasoning
Back to Logical Reasoning
Other Subjects
Questions and Answers for Competitive Exams Various Entrance Test