Law Exam Question and Answer
Law Exam Question and Answer
181. If in a trial for ‘causing death by negligence’ it is established that the accused had been at fault though victim had also been equally at fault—
- The fact that the actual injury was brought about by carelessness or contribution of the victim also, will be no defence
- Contributory negligence would be a good defence
- The degree of culpability as to the amount of negligence on his part shall be deciding factor
- None of the above
182. ‘A’, with the intention of murdering ‘Z’, instigates ‘B’, a child below seven years at age, to do an act which causes ‘Z’s death. ‘B’, in consequence of instigation, did the act in the absence of ‘A’, thereby causes ‘Z’s death. What offence has been committed by ‘A’ ?
- No offence, because ‘A’ was not present at the time of murder
- Committed simple offence of causing hurt
- Committed offence of attempt to murder
- Committed murder Ans :
183. Point out correct response—
In theft there must be—
In theft there must be—
- Dishonest intention to take any kind of property
- Dishonest intention to take any valuable security
- Dishonest intention to take any movable property
- Dishonest intention to take only immovable property
184. Which one of the following is not punishable under the Indian Penal Code ?
- Preparation to commit murder
- Preparation to commit dacoity
- Preparation to wage war against the state
- Preparation to commit depredation on the territory of a friendly power
185. A minor girl of 15 years of age left her father’s house with Rs. 10,000 and accompanied ‘Z’ to various places. All the traveling as well as Hotel charges were paid out of the said amount as ‘Z’ had no money. During the course of their journey ‘Z’ had sexual intercourse with her thrice with her consent. Here ‘Z’ is liable under section—
- 363 of Indian Penal Code
- 366 of Indian Penal Code
- 366-A of Indian Penal Code
- 376 of Indian Penal Code
186. ‘X’ and ‘Y’ agreed to commit murder of ‘Z’ by poisoning and ‘Y’ was to procure poison, but he did not procure it. ‘X’ and ‘Y’ are guilty of—
- Abetment of murder by conspiracy
- Attempt to murder with the aid of section 34 of Indian Penal Code
- No offence
- Criminal conspiracy to murder Z
187. Which of the following statements is correct ?
- The right of private defence under Indian Penal Code is available even against an act which is not offence under the code
- The right of private defence can be exercised to repeal unlawful aggression and also to retaliate
- The right of private defence is available to defend only one’s own person and property
- The right of private defence extends to the causing of death when the assault is made with the intention of wrongfully confining a person
188. Which one of the following is an inchoate-crime ?
- Riot
- Criminal attempt
- Unlawful assembly
- Public nuisance
189. Which of the following would not be relevant in evidence under section 8 of Indian Evidence Act ?
- Evidence of the existence of a motive for the crime charged
- Evidence of a statement which accompanies some conduct
- Evidence of a statement which influences and affects the conduct of a person, whose conduct is otherwise relevant
- Evidence of a statement of the act of robbery without making any complaint
190. Who amongst the following is not an accomplice ?
- A bribe giver
- A detective
- A prostitute
- A person receiving stolen property