Law Exam Question and Answer
Law Exam Question and Answer
191. When can a person prove his own statement constituting admission, or it may be proved on his behalf ?
- When it is relevant as dying declaration
- When it is relevant as admission
- When it is relevant as confession
- When it is only an oral admission as to content of electronic record
192. When can a person prove his own statement constituting admission, or it may be proved on his behalf ?
- When it is relevant as dying declaration
- When it is relevant as admission
- When it is relevant as confession
- When it is only an oral admission as to content of electronic record
193. What is the evidentiary value of the confession of a co-accused implicating himself as well as his other non-confessing coaccused ?
- Such a confession is relevant against all the co-accused
- It shall not be relevant against non-confessing coaccused
- Such a confession amounts to proof of guilt of all the coaccused
- If the confessing co-accused is acquitted of the main offence, his confession shall cease to be admissible
194. Admissions are—
- Conclusive proof
- Not Conclusive proof
- Not estoppel
- None of the above is correct
195. The case of Sarat Chander Dey v. Gopal Chander Laha, (1891) 19 I.A. 203 is related to which of the following section of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ?
- Section 6
- Section 115
- Section 124
- Section 45
196. In which year the electronic evidence was incorporated in the Indian evidence Act as a part of documentary Evidence ?
- 2001
- 2002
- 2000
- 1999
197. Which of the following is not a public document ?
- Records of a nationalized Bank
- A post-mortem report
- A private waqf deed, recorded in the office of subregistrar
- Entries made by a police officer in the site inspection map and site memo
198. An accused charged under section 302 and 304 B of the Indian Penal Code is acquitted of the offence under section 302 of Indian Penal Code. The presumption under section 113 B of the Evidence Act is—
- Automatically refuted
- Not refuted
- Not relevant
- Irrelevant and otiose
199. The case of Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor relates to—
- Res gestae
- Dying declaration
- Accomplice
- Co-accused
200. The main characteristic of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is—
- The separation of the judiciary from the executive
- The separation of the legislature from the executive
- The separation of the revenue work from the executive
- To provide judicial powers to the executive magistrates