Law Exam Question and Answer
Law Exam Question and Answer
231. The Public Prosecutor should inspect the Malkhana once is—
- A month
- Two months
- Three months
- A fortnight
232. Village Chaukidars are appointed by—
- Gram Pradhan
- In charge of the Police Station
- Superintendent of Police
- District Magistrate
233. Match List-I (Case) with List-II (Subject) and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists—
List-I
(a) Kehar Singh Vs. Delhi Administration
(b) Nawab Ali Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(c) Vishwanath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(d) Mehboob Shah Vs. Emperor
List-II
1. Right of private defence
2. Criminal Conspiracy
3. Common Intention
4. Common Object
5. Mistake of fact
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
List-I
(a) Kehar Singh Vs. Delhi Administration
(b) Nawab Ali Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(c) Vishwanath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(d) Mehboob Shah Vs. Emperor
List-II
1. Right of private defence
2. Criminal Conspiracy
3. Common Intention
4. Common Object
5. Mistake of fact
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
- 2 4 1 3
- 3 1 5 2
- 3 4 1 2
- 2 1 5 3
234. In a cognizable offence a police officer—
- cannot arrest an accused without warrant
- can keep the accused in police custody without a remand order
- is not required to produce the accused before a magistrate
- may arrest an accused without warrant
235. ‘A’ sought to appear in LL.B. examination on the basis of forged marks-sheet of B.A., but forged marks-sheet was detected before the commencement of examination—
- ‘A’ is not guilty of cheating
- ‘A’ is guilty of attempt to cheat
- ‘A’ is guilty of cheating
- None of the above
236. Which of the following is not necessary to constitute abetment by conspiracy ?
- A conspiracy between two or more persons
- An act or illegal omission must take place in pursuance of that conspiracy
- Such an act or illegal omission must also take place in order to do the thing conspired
- The abettor should concert the offence with the person who commits it
237.
48. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists—
List-I
(a) Tukaram Vs. State of Maharashtra
(b) State Vs. Nalini
(c) Barendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Emperor
(d) State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukh Deo Singh
List-II
1. General A.S. Vaidya case
2. Mathura rape case
3. Post-master murder case
4. Rajeev Gandhi murder case
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
48. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists—
List-I
(a) Tukaram Vs. State of Maharashtra
(b) State Vs. Nalini
(c) Barendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Emperor
(d) State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukh Deo Singh
List-II
1. General A.S. Vaidya case
2. Mathura rape case
3. Post-master murder case
4. Rajeev Gandhi murder case
Codes :
(a) (b) (c) (d)
- 2 4 3 1
- 1 2 3 4
- 4 3 2 1
- 3 1 2 4
238. Which of the following statements is not correct regarding ‘admission‘ under section 17 of Indian Evidence Act ?
- Admission operates as waiver of proof
- Admission is a statement which is necessarily against one’s own interest
- A statement which suggests some inference as to fact-in-issue or relevant fact, may be admission
- It is generally irrelevant as to whom an admission is made
239. In which section of Indian Penal Code the maxim ‘ignorantia juris non excusat’ is incorporated ?
- Section 78
- Section 76
- Section 79
- None of the above
240. Which one of the following is an illustration of criminal attempt ?
- ‘A’ tries to kill ‘B’ by witchcraft
- ‘A’ administers a poisonous drug to a woman ‘B’ with an intention to cause miscarriage, but the woman was not pregnant
- ‘A’ takes away his own umbrella thinking it to be of someone else
- ‘A’ goes to Kolkata to buy dyes to make counterfeit currency notes